Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health care reform. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Who'd a Thunk? SCOTUS Upholds Health Care Reform

Robert Reich thinks Chief Justice Roberts voted with his more Liberal counterparts to uphold the Affordable Care Act, lovingly called "Obamacare" by the GOP and their new poster boy MITT, as a reaction to his growing concerns about the Court and the country's reaction to what has appeared to be a series of partisan votes based on political views capped off by the Citizens United vote last Fall.  
Roberts’ decision is not without precedent. Seventy-five years ago, another Justice Roberts – no relation to the current Chief Justice – made a similar switch. Justice Owen Roberts had voted with the Court’s conservative majority in a host of 5-4 decisions invalidating New Deal legislation, but in March of 1937 he suddenly switched sides and began joining with the Court’s four liberals.  In popular lore, Roberts’ switch saved the Court – not only from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s threat to pack it with justices more amenable to the New Deal but, more importantly, from the public’s increasing perception of the Court as a partisan, political branch of government.  robertreich.org
Meanwhile, the debate continues about the effect this will have on the GOP presidential race and how the GOP can spin to their advantage.  Mitt will have answers once he's been briefed by his campaign managers.  At present he's sticking with "What the Supreme Court did not do, on its last day in session, I will do on my first day, if elected President of the United States. And that is, I will act to repeal Obamacare."  According to CNN, Mitt said "Obamacare" 18 times during this reaction speech.

(Oh Mitt, you have to get elected first.  You're not looking so good right now.  You can't even get the dialog back on the economy where you think you shine.)

For his part, the President practically thanked Romney for leading the way in health care reform as well as reminding the citizenry of the many benefits of the upheld law:



Oh shit, Atty. Gen. Eric Holder just found in "contempt of Congress" by virtue of Republican partisan votes in the House while all but 15 Democrats walked out in protest.  

Share/Bookmark

Saturday, June 25, 2011

The Long Slow Decline of Health Care

Earlier this month, a report was released "...suggesting that 30 percent of U.S. businesses will stop offering health care benefits to their employees after most of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act go into effect in 2014."   Worse yet, Wendell Potter photo above), author of the article about the report, former V.P corporate communications CIGNA, now whistle blower and consumer watchdog, predicts its eventual collapse. 

"When I began working in the insurance industry in 1989, the vast majority of Americans -- well over two-thirds of the population -- got their coverage through employers. Just about every year since then, the percentage has been declining."

Potter quotes a 2010 Gallup Poll reporting only 44.8% of American adults have insurance coverage through their employer.
 
My company's fiscal year insurance update was Thursday. We're taking a 19% increase in premiums for medical, 7% for dental,  with no improvement in coverage. Last year, we absorbed a 49% increase in medical and switch ed to a high deductible:  $3000  individual/$6000 family.  My Station Manager, in his mid-thirties, has two young children and is seriously contemplating not taking the insurance option this year because of the premiums.  His premiums and high deductible cost him more than his outlay for medical care.  Inotherwords, he's rolling the dice.

Our employer pays 50% of the premiums.  They contribute to our HSAs (healthcare savings accounts).  I know how lucky I am to have health insurance but I admit I took it for granted throughout my career.  I remember when health care was covered 100% by many employers in many categories of business.  

Fourteen years ago, my husband and I were self insured, living in California.  We had two small children, I'd taken a few years off, my husband had his own business.  At that time we had a $400 per month family premium with $750 deductible individual/$1500 family.  
The cost of health care has soared. The cost of medical care has gone up 136% since 1960 even when adjusted for inflation – from $8,100 in 1960 to $19,150 in 2010. Worse still, these numbers do not tell a complete story. Treating a sick child can be very expensive. High-tech medical advances have -while improving the quality of care – caused medical expenses to go through the roof. According a 2007 Congressional Budget Office report “about half of all growth in health care spending in the past several decades was associated with changes in medical care made possible by advances in technology.”  Skyrocketing Cost of Child Care: 1960 to Today
The other day I spoke with a close friend, also self-insured with a catastrophic policy.  She lives in Florida, is self employed.  She said when she receives treatment, she tells them she doesn't have insurance.  She has seen bills discounted by as much as two thirds!  She buys her prescriptions online from Canada.  What she pays for one month of Lipitor in the U.S. buys a 6 month prescription from Canada.

The Potter article concludes by commenting on the insurance industry's assault on small business,
"The reason more and more small employers are no longer offering coverage is because many of them have been "purged" by their insurance carriers. Insurers routinely "purge" employer customers they believe have become too much of a risk to profits. All it takes is one employee of a small business -- or the spouse or child of one employee -- to get critically ill for the company's insurer to jack up rates so high that the business owner has no choice but to drop coverage for everyone."
So, the insurance industry is having it both ways and our legislators do nothing.



Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

MediScare Goes Viral

Joe Scarborough calls it "Mediscare". The Repubs say it's being "demagogued". The Agenda Project has a response.




While I'm not crazy about the extreme approach, it certainly is attention getting; kinda like those "death panel" rants Sarah Palin was giving a while back. 

Jimmy Fallon, on "Morning Joe" this morning has a different take. 
"Any time you get to throw a dummy off a cliff, that's good stuff."


Share/Bookmark

Sunday, January 16, 2011

This IS Good News!




Think Obamacare isn't working?  Think again.  According to Forbes,

The major health insurance companies around the country are reporting a significant increase in small businesses offering health care benefits to their employees.
Why?  Because the tax cut created in the new health care reform law providing small businesses with an incentive to give health benefits to employees is working...
Private market insurance companies are experiencing significant growth because of a tax break provided by the PPACA...
United Health Group, Inc., the nation’s largest health insurer, added 75,000 new customers.
Coventry Health Care, Inc., a large provider of health insurance to small businesses, added 115,000 new workers in 2010 representing an 8% jump.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas City, the largest health insurer in the Kansas City, Mo. area, reports an astounding 58% increase...since April one month after the law took effect.
How ironic for The Party of No whose predictions of dire consequences, socialism, and unaffordable government mandated insurance policies for small businesses and ruination.  Could they be wrong?

Big thank you to injaynesworld for highlighting this in her "Sunday Recap" today.  


Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Here We Go Again

It's a new Congress:  Bi-Partisan time in the ole House tonight. and the Republicans are at it again. First on their agenda? Not job creation. No, it's repealing components of Health Care Reform. I mean, why let the Middle Class enjoy any kind of relief when they can tell their base, the 1% top income earners, not to worry about rolling back Bush tax increases?   The Republicans will just get it from the Middle Class, just as they've always done, right?



The more things change...

Share/Bookmark

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Did Jon Stewart Move Zadroga Act Passage through Media Pressure?

My Dec 18th post referred to Jon Stewart's last show of the year, 12/16/10 when he invited  9/11 First Responders on as guests, conferring with them about their fatal illnesses brought on by exposure to  the hazardous materials they handled and air they breathed during the long aftermath. 

Stewart admonished the Republican side of the Senate for filibustering additional health care coverage to First Responders.  He was extremely critical of mass media for failing to cover it.  The next day, everybody was suddenly talking about the health care defeat for these brave men & women.  A week later, before adjourning for the holidays, the Senate passed the bill with a reduced cap, from $7 billion to $4 billion. 

Was Stewart the critical game changer?  I think so. 

For more insight to the role he played, go here.



Share/Bookmark  

Friday, March 26, 2010

Friday Funnies: Maxine's Senior Health Care Option

So you're a senior citizen and the government says,

“No health care for you!”

What do you do? 

Maxine's plan gives anyone 65 years or older a gun and 4 bullets. You are allowed to shoot 2 senators and 2 representatives.  Of course, this means you will be sent to prison where you will get 3 meals a day, a roof over your head, and all the health care you need! New teeth, no problem.  Need glasses, great.  New hip, knees, kidney, lungs, heart?  All covered.
And your kids can come and visit you as often as they do now.

Who will be paying for all of this?  The same government that just told you you’re too old for health care. Plus, because you are a prisoner, you don't have to pay income taxes any more.

IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY OR WHAT?

Monday, March 22, 2010

Health Care Reform Bill: What Happens Now?


from AP:
A companion package making a series of changes sought by House Democrats to the larger bill, which already passed the Senate, was approved 220-211. The fix-it bill will now go to the Senate, where debate is expected to begin as early as Tuesday. Senate Democrats hope to approve it unchanged and send it directly to Obama, though Republicans intend to attempt parliamentary objections that could change the bill and require it to go back to the House.

Sen. John McCain said Monday morning that Democrats have not heard the last of the health care debate, and said he was repulsed by "all this euphoria going on."

Read the entire story.

In your face Teabaggers!

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Health Care Reform Passes 219-212!!!

Shouts of "Yes we can!" heard on the floor.  Read all about it here.

Image below uploaded from The Huffington Post

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Lobbies Against Health Care Reform

Doesn't this headline seem nonsensical and  at odds with the best interests of chamber of commerce members?

Read this:  Switchboard, from NRDC :: Pete Altman's Blog :: National Journal: Health Insurers Funded US Chamber Campaign Against Health Care Reform

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is funded by big insurance to lobby against health care reform.  Will it ever end?

Health Care Reform What Now?


Robert Reich wrote an interesting post Tuesday entitled The National Anthem--And Why We Need Health Care Reform So Desperately.  His title reference, "The National Anthem" refers to the big health care insurance company, Anthem.  They are his insurance company.  He lives in California.  They are my insurance company.  I live in New England.  They've just raised his premiums 39%.  They say have lost alot of policy holders due to the recession and therefore must spread their costs over a smaller pool.  Reich refutes this citing 4th quarter profits of their parent company, Wellpoint; tapping them as an aggressive opponent to health care reform, etc.  He states that consolidation among insurance companies is creating near monopolies but "insurers are exempt from the federal antitrust laws."

I did not know that.

His most compelling argument comes next and I believe it because I have heard other political observers observe the same thing:

"Obama says he’s open to any new ideas from Republicans for how to control health care costs and expand coverage. The problem is Republicans don’t want to play this game. They don’t care about controlling costs or expanding coverage. They care only about taking back the House and/or the Senate next November. And they believe a means toward attaining this goal is to prevent Obama from achieving a victory on health care."

Robert Reich is Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. Taken from Robert Reich's blog profile.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

Health Care Reform Passes House

I am psyched to learn, this morning, the health care reform bill passed the House of Representatives last night and a lone Republican voted for it.

David Brooks on Meet the Press just reminded the panel he's on,  "Once this becomes law it will become sacred" with the voters.   At this very moment, Bob Schieffer, on Face the Nation, is interviewing Sen. Lindsey Graham who advises him that, among others, Sen. Joe Lieberman will filibuster the bill in the Senate.
We still have a long way to go before this is made law but my belief is it will continue to morph.  The NY Times has a comprehensive first take on the voting results.



I hope everyone remembers Joe Lieberman is a senator from the state with the greatest concentration of insurance companies, Connecticut.

No conflict of interest there.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Health Care Reform: More Indecent Behaviour

Back to health care reform. This aired Wed. Oct 20th on "Countdown" and it is a tear jerker. No family should have to deal with this kind of harassment.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Health Care Reform: Insurance Industry Obscenities Toward Women

I wanted to embed a video snippet from last night's World News Tonight on women and health care.  For some reason, ABC only provides a link to the URL.    It's about women who've previously had C-sections either being refused health care coverage, in case they planned to have another costly baby, or, even more far out, being asked by one insurer to "get sterilized."  Said insurer, Golden Rule, was willing to pay for sterilization; not another baby.

Wow.  Do you still think the insurance industry doesn't need a MAJOR overhaul?

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Health Care Reform Clears First Hurdle

Remember that "anchor" reference my husband used in this post?  He was referring to one likely reason the Nobel Committee chose President Obama for the Peace Prize.

Yesterday, Olympia Snowe and fourteen other senators cleared the Baucus health care reform bill out of the Senate Finance Committee.  It has much farther to go and there are big elements fighting it.  From  "The Daily Beast" this morning, an excerpt:

"The opposition party's hostility to this modest reform looks hysterical, and the interest groups fighting against reform don't really seem to grasp how easy on them Obama and Congress are being. Private-sector players, in particular, ought to recognize that the Senate Finance Committee’s bill is incredibly generous to their interests by international standards and that if that generosity isn't rewarded with political success, next time around they're likely to see proposals they like a whole lot less."

We still don't have a public option and, frankly, without it, what's the point?  We need insurance companies to compete with something other than themselves.  Whether or not they openly collude, there isn't enough competition for any of us to get a real choice.  This goes far beyond health care.  Have you tried re-pricing your homeowner's or automobile insurance of late? 

I am often struck by the comments of people living outside the U.S. who are satisfied with their government provided health care.  Are they totally satisfied?  Some are.  And some are dissatisfied.  For the most part, however, I tend to see more pro government provided health care than con.  In fact, much of the criticism of those other health care plans seems to come from within the U.S.

U.S. citizens need affordable health care plans and that includes a public option.  More hurdles to clear.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Morals

My husband sent this via email today and I found it worth passing on:



 
MORALS
You are driving down the road in your car on a wild, stormy night, when you pass by a bus stop and you see three people waiting for the bus:

 

1. An old lady who looks as if she is about to die.

 

2. An old friend who once saved your life.

 

3. The perfect partner you have been dreaming about.

 

Which one would you choose to offer a ride to, knowing that there could only be one passenger in your car? Think before you continue reading.  This is a moral/ethical dilemma that was once actually used as part of a job application. You could pick up the old lady, because she is going to die, and thus you should save her first. Or you could take the old friend because he once saved your life, and this would be the perfect chance to pay him back. However, you may never be able to find your perfect mate again.

 
YOU WON'T BELIEVE THIS....................

 
The candidate who was hired (out of 200 applicants) had no trouble coming up with his answer. He simply answered: 'I would give the car keys to my old friend and let him take the lady to the hospital. I would stay behind and wait for the bus with the partner of my dreams.'  Sometimes, we gain more if we are able to give up our stubborn
thought limitations.  Never forget to 'Think Outside of the Box.'

 
HOWEVER...., The correct answer is to run the old lady over and put her out of her misery because without health care reform she is fucked anyway, have sex with the perfect partner on the hood of the car, then drive off with the old friend for a few beers.

 
God, I just love happy endings!

Friday, August 21, 2009

Back to Health Care Reform: I'm Addicted


Last night, Aug. 20th, Jon Stewart had a lengthy interview with Betsy McCaughey, former Lt. Gov. of NY under George Pataki, 1995-1998. She is, apparently, not the originator of the term "death panels" but the originator of the concept which Sarah Palin to the dismay, hysteria or fanfare of Americans, depending on which side of the health care fence they are on.

She walked on the set of The Daily Show last night carrying, she said, one half of House Bill 3200, the oh-so-wildly debated health care reform bill. She was there to underline her position on why this bill is bad, constantly referring to a specific paragraph on pages 425-430, which she then spent the majority of the show trying to find and read to Jon Stewart. Besides being under prepared for the timing demands of the show (no pages bookmarked, no paragraphs highlighted), her interpretation of the excerpts she read aloud was contradictory to what I heard and what Jon Stewart had read and interpreted.

"Did you ever think of putting Post-It notes on the page?" Stewart inquired at one point.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Betsy McCaughey Pt. 1
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests

I don't know if this woman is genuinely confused or if she's part of the conspiracy to confuse the public but it's hard to believe she's a former Lt. Gov and sits on some medical board. Can you imagine this woman making any significant decisions for you, least of all medical decisions?

Below is the rest of the interview, done off-air.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Exclusive - Betsy McCaughey Extended Interview Pt. 2
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests


Between her fuzzy math plan for debit card coverage and her resistance to having medical directive consultations with patients (something I think everyone needs to face) she came off as disingenuous and even a bit smarmy, perhaps thinking her charm would win the audience and/or Stewart over. I've read criticism he was not confrontational enough but I think he was balanced, funny and managed to pinpoint the absurdities and inaccuracies with great wit.

Sunday, August 16, 2009

Anger and Angst in America

Freedom of Speech by Norman Rockwell

The ongoing debates and angry sound bytes from town hall meetings has me thinking about where this over the top anger is coming from. The left likes to blame big corporations and conservative opposition; the right currently blames the Obama administration and big government. But hasn't this pent up hostility been building since Richard Nixon left the White House iin 1974?

For Baby Boomers, Watergate was the beginning of a lifelong distrust of politicians and power. Nixon's paranoia, and misuse of power left us wondering if we could ever trust our government again.

The examples I site are the result of failed policies in which one or both parties are liable.

The first auto bailout took place in 1979 when President Carter approved $1.2 billion dollars in loan guarantees for Chrysler. At the time, there was much disagreement about this policy. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, made a compelling case in a 1983 article about the fallacies of this loan program. Given the fact that all three automakers required a government bailout in 2008, it makes me wonder if we sustained a failed model for another thirty years or if we kept people in their jobs? Had the government implemented stringent requirements for more fuel efficient models thirty years ago, would the environment and the auto industry be in better shape today?

De-regulation of the broadcast industry began in 1981 under President Reagan. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, passed under President Clinton, promoted further deregulation of the entire telecommunications industry including cable, long distance telephone service, local telephone service, and broadband. According to the Museum of Broadcast Communications,

The act incorporates numerous changes to the rules dealing with radio and television ownership under the Communications Act of 1934 (New Deal legislation). Notably broadcasters have substantial regulatory relief from old and sometimes outmoded federal restrictions on station ownership requirements. Broadcast ownership limits on television stations have been lifted. Group owners can now purchase television stations with a maximum service area cap of 35% of the U. S. population, up from the previous limit of 25% established in 1985. Limits on the number of the radio stations that may be commonly owned have been completely lifted, though the bill does provide limits on the number of licenses that may be owned within specific markets or geographical areas.

Designed to create a competitive communications market and deliver better services and prices to consumers, the broadcast industry, instead, became consolidated. Competition eventually narrowed to five major companies who jammed a "one size fits all" mentality into their programming. Today, the majority of these companies are on the verge of bankruptcy thanks to over leveraging, mismanagement and a lack of government oversight.

President Reagan deregulated the airline industry, eventually dismantling the Civil Aeronautics Board. The idea was to increase competition among the airlines, to lower prices making it better for consumers. The short and long term results? Consolidation among airlines, miserable flying conditions, increased air traffic resulting in increased airline disasters. Former airline giants like TWA, Northwest have disappeared and other giants are in serious financial difficulty. Consumers are left with unreliable flight schedules, little or no accountability from their carriers, lost baggage, etc.

Bill Clinton promoted NAFTA, an agreement designed, according to the USDA Fact Sheet, to "increase agricultural trade and investment between the United States, Canada and Mexico" and benefit "farmers, ranchers and consumers throughout North America."

Not surprisingly, according to a 2001 article in Public Citizen, Ralph Nader's consumer advocacy group, just the opposite occurred:

"During the 1993 Congressional battle about the fate of NAFTA’s approval, U.S. farmers were promised that NAFTA would provide a path to lasting economic success through rising exports. Consumers were promised lower food prices. These promised benefits never materialized during seven years of NAFTA: farm income has declined and consumer prices have risen while some agribusinesses — which lobbied hard for NAFTA and now are avidly promoting Fast Track — have seen record profits."

Independent farmers and growers were convinced NAFTA would lead to decreased competition in their industry. 13 years later, prices to consumers are sky high and the farming industry is fighting for its existence. For example, dairy farmers are going under at an alarming rate. They can no longer afford to produce a product they cannot sell at a profit or even break even prices. NAFTA will probably be repealed in the next few years. Ironically, one of the repeal proponents is Secy of State, Hillary Clinton.

Another contributor to the current financial downfall was the repeal the Glass Steagall Act in 1999. Investopedia, a Forbes digital company explains:

In 1933, in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash and during a nationwide commercial bank failure and the Great Depression, two members of Congress put their names on what is known today as the Glass-Steagall Act (GSA). This act separated investment and commercial banking activities. At the time, "improper banking activity", or what was considered overzealous commercial bank involvement in stock market investment, was deemed the main culprit of the financial crash. According to that reasoning, commercial banks took on too much risk with depositors' money.

By the end of Bill Clinton's second term, the budget surplus was $127 billion. The 2003 invasion of Iraq began the decimation of this surplus. To add insult to injury, the Bush administration directed an invasion based on "faulty intelligence" etc etc. Under their watch, Halliburton enjoyed "no contest" bids for jobs in the Middle East, costing American taxpayers billions. TARP was pushed through Congress without national public approval. The average American tax payer is confused and feels helpless.

Right now, the Obama administration is the recipient of the anger. They did not create the Iraqi war; they did not design and implement the original TARP plan. They have inherited a 35 year old mess in the making and it is everyone's doing.

As citizens, we need to be knowledgeable. We cannot vote our emotions. We have to understand both sides of the issues and pick the side that makes sense.



Watch CBS Videos Online

Christina

Christina
by Cole Scott